[Sorry for the delay]
> > The patch contains long lines.
>
> Didn't know we had switched over to caring that much. Want me to fix all
> of gcc/*.[ch]?
Nope, just not introduce new long lines.
> Ok?
Almost. It looks like we now pass twice the same argument to follow_jumps,
i.e. we have LABEL
Ping?
On Apr 22, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> This patch fixes up hot/cold partitioning on ports that don't have long
>>> conditional branches. I'll note that the entire file has lots of other
>>> jump optimizations that are suspect.
On Apr 22, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> This patch fixes up hot/cold partitioning on ports that don't have long
>> conditional branches. I'll note that the entire file has lots of other
>> jump optimizations that are suspect.
>
> Do you have a testcase for one of the ports in the tre
> This patch fixes up hot/cold partitioning on ports that don't have long
> conditional branches. I'll note that the entire file has lots of other
> jump optimizations that are suspect.
Do you have a testcase for one of the ports in the tree? Note that parameters
of function must be documented
This patch fixes up hot/cold partitioning on ports that don't have long
conditional branches. I'll note that the entire file has lots of other jump
optimizations that are suspect.
Ok?
2011-04-21 Mike Stump
* reorg.c (relax_delay_slots): Don't delete a jump that crosses a
se
