On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 12:39, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> The attached patch fixes pr22051-2.c which regressed due to
> >> r238754. Matthew, could you please confirm if this patch fixes th
On 4 August 2016 at 12:39, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> The attached patch fixes pr22051-2.c which regressed due to
>> r238754. Matthew, could you please confirm if this patch fixes the
>> test-case for you ?
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on x8
On 03/08/16 23:08, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch fixes pr22051-2.c which regressed due to
r238754. Matthew, could you please confirm if this patch fixes the
test-case for you ?
Confirmed. (Tested with arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.)
Thanks
Matthew
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> The attached patch fixes pr22051-2.c which regressed due to
> r238754. Matthew, could you please confirm if this patch fixes the
> test-case for you ?
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> Cross tested on arm*-*-*.
> OK f
Hi,
The attached patch fixes pr22051-2.c which regressed due to
r238754. Matthew, could you please confirm if this patch fixes the
test-case for you ?
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Cross tested on arm*-*-*.
OK for trunk ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2016-08-04 Prathamesh Kulkarni