On 10/22/20 11:30 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, Jonathan Yong wrote:
No objections for mingw-w64 since it has been tested, but I'm not
certain if the original mingw.org version has it.
Prompted by you, I looked into the original mingw32, and found it does
NOT have sincos, so I w
On Oct 22, 2020, Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No objections for mingw-w64 since it has been tested, but I'm not
> certain if the original mingw.org version has it.
Prompted by you, I looked into the original mingw32, and found it does
NOT have sincos, so I withdraw the patch, in fav
On 10/22/20 5:01 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Err, sorry, I mislabeled this patch as [FYI,Ada], but it is neither
about Ada nor pre-approved. It does require a review before I can check
it in.
No objections for mingw-w64 since it has been tested, but I'm not
certain if the original mingw.org v
Err, sorry, I mislabeled this patch as [FYI,Ada], but it is neither
about Ada nor pre-approved. It does require a review before I can check
it in.
On Oct 22, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> for gcc/ChangeLog
> * config/i386/cygming.h (TARGET_LIBC_HAS_FUNCTION): Enable
> sincos opti
The sincos transformation does not take place on all platforms,
because the libc_has_function target hook disables it by default.
Current w64-mingw's math library supports sincos, sincosl and sincosf,
in 32- and 64-bit modes. I suppose this has been this way for long,
also with mingw32 and cygw
