Hi Nathan,
On 14/03/19 16:59, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I see this is DR 36.
http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21kona2019/CoreWorkingGroup/cwg_active.html#36
I still think we should drop this check, for one thing we don't apply
it consistently (eg, naming an unscoped enum value).
I see that for example
I see this is DR 36.
http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21kona2019/CoreWorkingGroup/cwg_active.html#36
I still think we should drop this check, for one thing we don't apply it
consistently (eg, naming an unscoped enum value).
On 3/14/19 11:47 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Jason, Paolo,
This concerns:
nam
Jason, Paolo,
This concerns:
namespace N
{
int i;
}
void
f ()
{
using N::i;
using N::i; // { dg-error "declared" }
}
which is extracted from g++.dg/lookup/using53.C added fixing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20420
The comment mentions C++11 7.3.3/10, which does giv