Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> $ git ls-files .|xargs perl -0777 -n -e 'while (/\b(it)\s+\1\b/gms)'
>> -e '{$n=($` =~ tr/\n/\n/ + 1); ($v=$&)=~s/\n/\\n/g; print
>> "$ARGV:$n:$v\n"}'|grep -v ChangeLog
>> gcc/config/cris/cris.opt:152:it it
>> gcc/gensupport.c:
On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> $ git ls-files .|xargs perl -0777 -n -e 'while (/\b(it)\s+\1\b/gms)' -e
> '{$n=($` =~ tr/\n/\n/ + 1); ($v=$&)=~s/\n/\\n/g; print "$ARGV:$n:$v\n"}'|grep
> -v ChangeLog
> gcc/config/cris/cris.opt:152:it it
> gcc/gensupport.c:1066:it\n it
These
Diego Novillo wrote:
...
> Feel free to commit any of the patches in this series of typo fixes
> you just posted.
Thanks.
Done, with this:
From 7d5f43492809f2d96149853941bc8e0a9e7ecd10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:31:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix doubled-
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:40, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
I think these are obvious.
>>>
>>> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval
>>
>> Well, techni
On Apr 18, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> If you hadn't said anything, I would have committed those typo fixes
> by now, based on what I perceived as your review/approval and on my
> reading of this part of http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html:
>
>Free for all
>
>The following change
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:40:03PM CEST:
> Mike Stump wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> >> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
> >>> I think these are obvious.
> >>
> >> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit appr
Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> I think these are obvious.
>>
>> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval
>
> Well, technically, it means nothing... It only means something if the
>
On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
>> I think these are obvious.
>
> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval
Well, technically, it means nothing... It only means something if the
maintainer agrees with me,
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
> I think these are obvious.
Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval,
Jim.
Gerald
On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:18 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> While most of these are in comments, the corrections
> in gcc/tree-cfg.c and gcc/config/sh/constraints.md are in strings.
> The former at least is marked for translation, and hence appears
> in every .po file.
I think these are obvious.
>
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering
---
While most of these are in comments, the corrections
in gcc/tree-cfg.c and gcc/config/sh/constraints.md are in strings.
The former at least is marked for translation, and hence appears
in every .po file.
gcc/config/alpha/vms-unwind.h |4 ++--
gcc/config/
Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
>> "to to"
>
> I fixed all the non-surious matches in the gcc/testsuite. if if in
> the fortran testsui
Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
>
> I've fixed the obviously wrong ones in gcc/.* excluding ada and go. I
> don't hate Ada and go, since I d
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
> boehm-gc/configure.host:5:the the
> boehm-gc/doc/README:123:to to
> boehm-gc/misc.c:212:to to
> boehm-gc/os_dep.c:4010:to to
Maintained externally and the GCC copy is very out-of-date. Send patches
to upstream boehm-gc instead.
> libdecnumber/decCommo
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I would be inclined to prepare a patch if I thought it would
> be applied (promptly?), but I submitted a clear/simple fix for
> an obvious double-free bug (albeit only in a test case) a month ago:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/85973/
>
On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
I've fixed the obviously wrong ones in gcc/.* excluding ada and go. I don't
hate Ada and go, since I don't pretend to keep up on rules to th
On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I would be inclined to prepare a patch if I thought it would
> be applied (promptly?), but I submitted a clear/simple fix for
> an obvious double-free bug (albeit only in a test case) a month ago:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/85973/
On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
> "to to"
I fixed all the non-surious matches in the gcc/testsuite. if if in the fortran
testsuite was the major spurious match. Thanks
I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
"to to", etc. in other packages, so wrote this to find more of them:
git ls-files|xargs perl -0777 -n \
-e 'while (/\b(then?|if|but|or|and|to)\s+\1\b/gms)' \
-e '{$n=($
19 matches
Mail list logo
