On 12/06/2016 11:40 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
I understand that config/ in the gcc repository is the master source
for binutils-gdb config/. If that's the case then people removing
gcc support for particular targets need to be careful about their
config/ edits. If a target is still supported in bin
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 08:46:32PM +0900, Oleg Endo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, my SH5/SH64 removal procedures might have been a little too
> radical, sorry about that. However ...
>
> On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 09:10 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > I understand that config/ in the gcc repository is the mast
Hi,
Yeah, my SH5/SH64 removal procedures might have been a little too
radical, sorry about that. However ...
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 09:10 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> I understand that config/ in the gcc repository is the master source
> for binutils-gdb config/. If that's the case then people rem
I understand that config/ in the gcc repository is the master source
for binutils-gdb config/. If that's the case then people removing
gcc support for particular targets need to be careful about their
config/ edits. If a target is still supported in binutils, then
please don't rip out config/ sup
