On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:38:22PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 9/16/20 2:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:11:32PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > > Jakub,
> > > are you ok with the bool return from cp_check_omp_declare_reduction? That
> > > seemed like the least inv
On 9/16/20 2:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:11:32PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Jakub,
are you ok with the bool return from cp_check_omp_declare_reduction? That
seemed like the least invasive change.
This corrects the earlier problems with removing the template header
f
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:11:32PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Jakub,
> are you ok with the bool return from cp_check_omp_declare_reduction? That
> seemed like the least invasive change.
>
> This corrects the earlier problems with removing the template header
> from local omp reductions. And i
Jakub,
are you ok with the bool return from cp_check_omp_declare_reduction?
That seemed like the least invasive change.
This corrects the earlier problems with removing the template header
from local omp reductions. And it uncovered a latent bug. When we
tsubst such a decl, we immediately tsu