Re: analyzer branch renamed to "devel/analyzer"

2020-01-18 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, David Malcolm wrote: > The new git server doesn't seem to like such branch names [1], so I'm > now using "devel/analyzer" Do you plan to also document this in git.html (per the message below you quoted ;-)? > remote: *** Shared development branches should be named devel/*,

Re: analyzer branch renamed to "devel/analyzer"

2020-01-15 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 15/01/2020 15:19, David Malcolm wrote: Although most of the analyzer work is now on master I'm tracking additional work in a branch (for future features, work that isn't quite ready yet, etc). This used to be "dmalcolm/analyzer" on the git mirror. The new git server doesn't seem to like such

analyzer branch renamed to "devel/analyzer"

2020-01-15 Thread David Malcolm
Although most of the analyzer work is now on master I'm tracking additional work in a branch (for future features, work that isn't quite ready yet, etc). This used to be "dmalcolm/analyzer" on the git mirror. The new git server doesn't seem to like such branch names [1], so I'm now using "devel/a