Hello, Iain,
Sorry about the late response.
On Mar 11, 2021, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 10, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>>> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128.
>>
>> I've been reminded that this is not enough for the scan-assembler tests
>>
es -mfloat128, I'd get the expect asm by just
cancelling out the -mstrict-align flag that the toolchain I'm testing
enables by default. So here's my updated patch, that I'm nearly done
retesting. Ok to install?
add -mfloat128 to __float128-using test missing it
Most (all?)
that, besides -mfloat128, I'd get the expect asm by just
cancelling out the -mstrict-align flag that the toolchain I'm testing
enables by default. So here's my updated patch, that I'm nearly done
retesting. Ok to install?
add -mfloat128 to __float128-using test missing it
Most (all
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 10, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
* gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128.
I've been reminded that this is not enough for the scan-assembler tests
to pass, at least in our configurations. Nearly all of the asm
expectations are unmet. I'm yet to
On Mar 10, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128.
I've been reminded that this is not enough for the scan-assembler tests
to pass, at least in our configurations. Nearly all of the asm
expectations are unmet. I'm yet to identify the root ca
Most (all?) powerpc tests that use the __float128 type either enable
it with -mfloat128, or use effective target requirements to check for
its presence.
prefix-ds-dq.c is failing in some of our configurations because it
uses the __float128 type without checking for it, or enabling it
explicitly.
