On 29 May 2015 at 09:32, Shiva Chen wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I modify the patch as you suggestion and testing on 32/64 bit host.
>
> Thanks your tips.
>
> I really appreciate for your help.
>
> Shiva
OK and committed with this ChangeLog:
2015-06-14 Shiva Chen
* aarch64.c (aarch64_simd_lane_bo
Hi, Andrew
I modify the patch as you suggestion and testing on 32/64 bit host.
Thanks your tips.
I really appreciate for your help.
Shiva
2015-05-29 15:57 GMT+08:00 Andrew Pinski :
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Shiva Chen wrote:
>> Hi, Andrew
>>
>> You are right, it's much simpler.
>>
>>
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Shiva Chen wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> You are right, it's much simpler.
>
> Could you give me a tip how %wd works on GCC ?
the w modifier is the GCC diagnostic format modifier that specifies
HOST_WIDE_INT.
>
> Could you send a new patch to fix the message since you
Hi, Andrew
You are right, it's much simpler.
Could you give me a tip how %wd works on GCC ?
Could you send a new patch to fix the message since you have better solution ?
Thanks,
Shiva
2015-05-29 15:13 GMT+08:00 Andrew Pinski :
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Shiva Chen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Shiva Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I notice that aarch64 simd index range message not correct on 32 bit host.
>
> The message print by the function aarch64_simd_lane_bounds in aarch64.c.
>
> The function print HOST_WIDE_INT variable by %ld which is correct on
> 64 bit hos
Hi,
I notice that aarch64 simd index range message not correct on 32 bit host.
The message print by the function aarch64_simd_lane_bounds in aarch64.c.
The function print HOST_WIDE_INT variable by %ld which is correct on
64 bit host.
However, on 32 bit host HOST_WIDE_INT would be long long.
Th
