> On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > this patch takes care of gcov. There are two oddities. First that gcov uses
> > langhook to produce new records while asan gets around with make_node.
> > I think both are middle-end types and in the direction of separating
> > front-ends
>
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi
> this patch takes care of gcov. There are two oddities. First that gcov uses
> langhook to produce new records while asan gets around with make_node.
> I think both are middle-end types and in the direction of separating
> front-ends
> and middle-end
Hi
this patch takes care of gcov. There are two oddities. First that gcov uses
langhook to produce new records while asan gets around with make_node.
I think both are middle-end types and in the direction of separating front-ends
and middle-ends better the langhooks are not desirable.
The TYPE_ST
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > tree type_decl = build_decl (input_location, TYPE_DECL,
> > >
> > >get_identifier ("__asan_global"), ret);
> > >
> > > DECL_IGNORED_P (type_decl) = 1;
> > tree type_decl = build_decl (input_location, TYPE_DECL,
> >
> >get_identifier ("__asan_global"), ret);
> >
> > DECL_IGNORED_P (type_decl) = 1;
> >
> > DECL_ARTIFICIAL (type_d
> > tree type_decl = build_decl (input_location, TYPE_DECL,
> >
> >get_identifier ("__asan_global"), ret);
> >
> > DECL_IGNORED_P (type_decl) = 1;
> >
> > DECL_ARTIFICIAL (type_d
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > extra sanity checking I am going to send in followup patch noticed that we
> > > stream pointer types that was never seen by free_lang_data. This is
> > > because
> > > they are referenced by
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > extra sanity checking I am going to send in followup patch noticed that we
> > stream pointer types that was never seen by free_lang_data. This is because
> > they are referenced by TYPE_POINTER_TO list and are inserted into the gimple
> > s
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> extra sanity checking I am going to send in followup patch noticed that we
> stream pointer types that was never seen by free_lang_data. This is because
> they are referenced by TYPE_POINTER_TO list and are inserted into the gimple
> statements late
Hi,
extra sanity checking I am going to send in followup patch noticed that we
stream pointer types that was never seen by free_lang_data. This is because
they are referenced by TYPE_POINTER_TO list and are inserted into the gimple
statements later when we wrap everything in MEM_REF (by make_point
10 matches
Mail list logo
