On 08/24/2018 05:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
@@ -1407,7 +1407,10 @@ extract_range_from_binary_expr_1 (value_range *vr,
&& code != POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
&& (vr0.type == VR_VARYING
|| vr1.type == VR_VARYING
- || vr0.type != vr1.type
+ || (vr0.type != vr1.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/23/2018 05:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:31 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08/21/2018 05:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:33 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
On 08/23/2018 05:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:31 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 08/21/2018 05:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:33 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Finally, my apologies for including a tiny change to the
POINTER_PLUS_EXPR handling
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:31 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/21/2018 05:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:33 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> >> Finally, my apologies for including a tiny change to the
> >> POINTER_PLUS_EXPR handling code as well. It came about the s
On 08/21/2018 05:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:33 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Finally, my apologies for including a tiny change to the
POINTER_PLUS_EXPR handling code as well. It came about the same set of
auditing tests.
Bah, please split up things here ;) I've do