On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> This patch makes can_vec_perm_p & co. take a vec<>, wrapped in new
> typedefs vec_perm_indices and auto_vec_perm_indices. There are two
> reasons for doing this for SVE:
>
> (1) it means that the number of elements is bundled with the el
This patch makes can_vec_perm_p & co. take a vec<>, wrapped in new
typedefs vec_perm_indices and auto_vec_perm_indices. There are two
reasons for doing this for SVE:
(1) it means that the number of elements is bundled with the elements
themselves, and is obviously constant.
(2) it makes it e