Renlin Li writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/06/16 11:21, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Jan Hubicka writes:
>>
>>> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
>
> This fails for all arm and aarch64 targets as
Hi,
On 08/06/16 11:21, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jan Hubicka writes:
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
This fails for all arm and aarch64 targets as well since the commit.
Regards,
Renl
Hi Honza,
On 07/06/16 20:27, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hello,
Maritn Liska measured branch predictor hitrates on current tree and SPEC2006.
CPU2006
HEURISTICS BRANCHES (REL) HITRATE
COVERAGE COVERAGE (REL)
loop iv compare33 0.1
> On 06/07/2016 09:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > There are bugs in few predictors - goto predictor is dead because the FE
> > code was dropped,
> > return predictor is bit random because CFG is optimized (it should probably
> > be done in FE),
> > loop iv compare seems bogus and fortran fail allo
On 06/07/2016 09:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> There are bugs in few predictors - goto predictor is dead because the FE code
> was dropped,
> return predictor is bit random because CFG is optimized (it should probably
> be done in FE),
> loop iv compare seems bogus and fortran fail alloc does not s
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >> On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> >> > Jan Hubicka writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
>> >> >
>> >> > FAIL: gcc.dg/
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> > Jan Hubicka writes:
> >> >
> >> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
> >> >
> >> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?*
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> > Jan Hubicka writes:
>> >
>> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
>> >
>> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
>> >
>> >
> On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Jan Hubicka writes:
> >
> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
>
> Hi.
>
> It's caused by a different pr
On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jan Hubicka writes:
>
>> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
>
> Andreas.
>
Hi.
It's caused by a different probabilities for BB 2:
@@
> On 06/07/2016 09:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > There are bugs in few predictors - goto predictor is dead because the FE
> > code was dropped,
> > return predictor is bit random because CFG is optimized (it should probably
> > be done in FE),
> > loop iv compare seems bogus and fortran fail allo
On 06/07/2016 09:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> There are bugs in few predictors - goto predictor is dead because the FE code
> was dropped,
> return predictor is bit random because CFG is optimized (it should probably
> be done in FE),
> loop iv compare seems bogus and fortran fail alloc does not s
Jan Hubicka writes:
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"An
Hello,
Maritn Liska measured branch predictor hitrates on current tree and SPEC2006.
CPU2006
HEURISTICS BRANCHES (REL) HITRATE
COVERAGE COVERAGE (REL)
loop iv compare33 0.1% 20.27% / 86.24%
30630826 30.63M 0.0%
14 matches
Mail list logo
