On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:57 AM Rainer Orth
wrote:
> The following patch has remained unreviewed for two weeks:
> [build] Support SHF_EXCLUDE on non-x86 and with Solaris as
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00465.html
> Most of it falls under my Solaris maintain
The following patch has remained unreviewed for two weeks:
[build] Support SHF_EXCLUDE on non-x86 and with Solaris as
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00465.html
Most of it falls under my Solaris maintainership, I believe, but running
the SHF_EXCLUDE configure
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 01:54:41PM +0100, FX wrote:
> > The following patch has remained unreviewed for a week:
> >
> > [build] Disable hwcaps on libgfortran
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00336.html
> >
> > It is required to unbreak bootstrap on Solaris/x86 and, tho
> The following patch has remained unreviewed for a week:
>
> [build] Disable hwcaps on libgfortran
>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00336.html
>
> It is required to unbreak bootstrap on Solaris/x86 and, though touching
> both libgfortran and libitm, probably needs pri
The following patch has remained unreviewed for a week:
[build] Disable hwcaps on libgfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00336.html
It is required to unbreak bootstrap on Solaris/x86 and, though touching
both libgfortran and libitm, probably needs primarily a bu
On 04/06/2016 04:58 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The following patch has remainded unreviewed for a week:
[testsuite, sparcv9] Fix gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c on 64-bit SPARC (PR
rtl-optimization/68749)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01631.html
Although it's testsuite-only, I'm q
The following patch has remainded unreviewed for a week:
[testsuite, sparcv9] Fix gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c on 64-bit SPARC (PR
rtl-optimization/68749)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01631.html
Although it's testsuite-only, I'm quite reluctant to make potential
semantic cha
Jeff Law writes:
> On 11/06/2015 06:29 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> The following patch has remained unrevied for a month:
>>
>> [build] Support init priority on Solaris
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00716.html
>>
>> It needs build and ia64 maintainers and someone fa
On 11/06/2015 06:29 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The following patch has remained unrevied for a month:
[build] Support init priority on Solaris
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00716.html
It needs build and ia64 maintainers and someone familiar with the init
priority su
The following patch has remained unrevied for a month:
[build] Support init priority on Solaris
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00716.html
It needs build and ia64 maintainers and someone familiar with the init
priority support to review.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
On 02/22/14 16:07, rbmj wrote:
Hi all,
Just a ping, I haven't gotten anything back on this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00621.html
The patch needs to be tested by bootstrapping on another platform and
performing a regression test.Most folks use an x86_64 linux system
On 25-Feb-14 01:21, Jeff Law wrote:
I think this should be queued until after 4.9 branches. It's adding a
new capability (posix threading on vxworks), not fixing a bug and
certainly not fixing a regression AFAICT.
Fair enough. It just seems somewhat trivial to me, as it doesn't add
any funct
On 02/22/14 16:07, rbmj wrote:
Hi all,
Just a ping, I haven't gotten anything back on this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00621.html
I think this should be queued until after 4.9 branches. It's adding a
new capability (posix threading on vxworks), not fixing a bug and
cer
Hi all,
Just a ping, I haven't gotten anything back on this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00621.html
Thanks!
14 matches
Mail list logo
