> there's nothing that could affect them.
Famous last words :-)
DJ Delorie writes:
>> [build] More --enable-threads cleanup
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00059.html
>>
>> This might well be obvious.
>
> Also, we usually leave those up to the target maintainers, since
> they're target specific. But if it's just a correlation be
> [build] More --enable-threads cleanup
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00059.html
>
> This might well be obvious.
Also, we usually leave those up to the target maintainers, since
they're target specific. But if it's just a correlation between the
script and a list
The following two build-related patches have remained unreviewed for 2
or more weeks:
[build, lto] Check plugin linker for level of plugin support
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00226.html
Embedded in a different thread, but reminded 4 times now and all open
question