On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> In gcc-5/changes.html the section about __has_include and __has_include_next
> says:
>
> The header search paths for __has_include_next and __has_include_next are
> equivalent to those of the standard directive #include and the extension
> #include_
In gcc-5/changes.html the section about __has_include and __has_include_next
says:
The header search paths for __has_include_next and __has_include_next are
equivalent to those of the standard directive #include and the extension
#include_next respectively.
I think the first __has_include_next
