cr16-elf regressed this test:
cr16-sim: gcc.dg/Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch-9.c (test for excess errors)
There's a dg-prune in the test which stripped out some messages, but it
wasn't sufficient to cover the 16 bit targets. This patch adds another
string to prune. Committed.
Jeff
gcc/t
This regression slipped in because my testing was a week old. The
predict-22.c is a commit of Nov 28.
Thanks Jeff. I saw this regression yesterday and was about to send the
patch shortly.
I should have kept the patch tested proactively.
Thanks
Indu
On 12/01/2018 08:56 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
Indu's change to clean up some profiling dumps clearly wasn't regression
tested as it fails on every target.
We have an edge to a block with a call to an explicitly marked cold
function in it. We consider that a precise prediction.
Indu's change reflects that information into the dump file, ch
I added a C++ test with a .c extension. Oops. Corrected in the obvious
way :-) Committed to the trunk.
* g++.dg/pr61289-2.C: Renamed from pr61289-2.c.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr61289-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr61289-2.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..4cc3ebe
Jeff Law writes:
> commit 07373396d21b65f975c2354e7c6ab454200b40af
> Author: Jeff Law
You should set the author accordingly.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different.
A private message from Kai to myself include this patch to fix an out
of bounds array access in the testsuite.
Installed on the trunk for Kai.
commit 07373396d21b65f975c2354e7c6ab454200b40af
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Apr 29 10:22:11 2013 -0600
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr55875
