On 04/27/2011 05:50 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Continuing the toplevel cleanups separating the cases disabling
different subdirectories - on the basis that eventually this
information should come from the subdirectories, and that as
previously discussed much of the default disabling of ${libgcj}
On Apr 27, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Continuing the toplevel cleanups separating the cases disabling
> different subdirectories
I've audited the two patches for darwin and they seem safe. Took me a second
to figure out why though.
Continuing the toplevel cleanups separating the cases disabling
different subdirectories - on the basis that eventually this
information should come from the subdirectories, and that as
previously discussed much of the default disabling of ${libgcj}
doesn't actually make sense - this patch separate
