Already submitted by gjl in rev. 185259.
-Sri.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/12/12 10:26, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Is this ok for trunk? Asking you because you approved the patch the
>> first time around.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Sri.
>>
>> On
On 03/12/12 10:26, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Is this ok for trunk? Asking you because you approved the patch the
> first time around.
>
> Thanks,
> -Sri.
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> Please see:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=525
Hi Richard,
Is this ok for trunk? Asking you because you approved the patch the
first time around.
Thanks,
-Sri.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Please see:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52545
>
> SECTION_EXCLUDE should not take up bits reserved for SE
Please see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52545
SECTION_EXCLUDE should not take up bits reserved for SECTION_MACH_DEP
Patch:
PR 52545
* output.h (SECTION_MACH_DEP)
(SECTION_EXCLUDE): Swap values.
Index: output.h
==