Re: Support parallel testing in libgomp, part I [PR66005]

2023-05-08 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches
On Mon, 8 May 2023 12:42:33 +0200 Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >> +if [info exists ::env(GCC_RUNTEST_PARALLELIZE_DIR)] { > >> +load_file ../libgomp-test-support.exp > >> +} else { > >> +load_file libgomp-test-support.exp > >> +} > > > > Do we have to re-read those? Other

Re: Support parallel testing in libgomp, part I [PR66005]

2023-05-08 Thread Thomas Schwinge
xisting/independent thing to look into. >> And, for now, I hard-code the number of parallel slots to one. This >> means that libgomp for 'make -j' now does use the parallel testing code >> paths, but is restricted to just one slot. That is, no actual change in &

Re: Support parallel testing in libgomp, part I [PR66005]

2023-05-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches
, but is restricted to just one slot. That is, no actual change in > behavior, other than that 'libgomp.sum' then is filtered through > 'contrib/dg-extract-results.sh'. > > OK to push the attached > "Support parallel testing in libgomp, part I [PR66005]&quo

Support parallel testing in libgomp, part I [PR66005]

2023-05-05 Thread Thomas Schwinge
s that libgomp for 'make -j' now does use the parallel testing code paths, but is restricted to just one slot. That is, no actual change in behavior, other than that 'libgomp.sum' then is filtered through 'contrib/dg-extract-results.sh'. OK to push the attached "Suppo