onathan (and the libstdc++ list). Can we revive this? I sent the
> >>>>patches for improving the smart pointer pretty printers in March. They
> >>>>haven't been reviewed.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for the reminder. I'm testing the attached patch, w
pointer pretty printers in March. They
haven't been reviewed.
Thanks for the reminder. I'm testing the attached patch, which has
been rebased on trunk, but I'm getting test failures for the
shared_ptr printers.
I can't see any difference between the expected output and what GD
On 09/01/18 15:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/01/18 14:59 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/01/18 11:22 +0100, Juraj Oršulić wrote:
Hi Jonathan (and the libstdc++ list). Can we revive this? I sent the
patches for improving the smart pointer pretty printers in March. They
haven't
On 02/03/17 19:10 +0100, Juraj Oršulić wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
For a patch this size we do, so I'm not going to look at your patch.
It will probably be simpler to just do it myself, and not worry about
paperwork.
If you want to contribue in future then pl
On 09/01/18 14:59 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/01/18 11:22 +0100, Juraj Oršulić wrote:
Hi Jonathan (and the libstdc++ list). Can we revive this? I sent the
patches for improving the smart pointer pretty printers in March. They
haven't been reviewed.
Thanks for the reminder. I'
On 04/01/18 11:22 +0100, Juraj Oršulić wrote:
Hi Jonathan (and the libstdc++ list). Can we revive this? I sent the
patches for improving the smart pointer pretty printers in March. They
haven't been reviewed.
Thanks for the reminder. I'm testing the attached patch, which has
been
