Sure. No problem. Thanks for looking at this.
Aldy
On Fri, May 31, 2019, 17:48 Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2019, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> > I've never been too happy with the too large due to cast warnings. For
> that
> > matter, it seems like a lot of the unbounded alloca warning vari
On Fri, 31 May 2019, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I've never been too happy with the too large due to cast warnings. For that
matter, it seems like a lot of the unbounded alloca warning variants were
artifacts of the way we couldn't get precise ranges after vrp asserts had
disappeared and we were tryin
I've never been too happy with the too large due to cast warnings. For that
matter, it seems like a lot of the unbounded alloca warning variants were
artifacts of the way we couldn't get precise ranges after vrp asserts had
disappeared and we were trying to guess at what the actual range in the
ori
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:28 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> Hello,
> >
On 5/29/19 3:27 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2 pie
On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
2 pieces:
- the first one handles the case where the denominator is negative. It
doesn't h
On 5/29/19 1:21 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:34 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>>
>> On 5/21/19 3:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:13 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc G
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:34 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 5/21/19 3:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:13 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 201
On 5/21/19 3:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:13 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
Hel
I don't know if there's the -Walloca pass would benefit from merging
with any of the others or vice versa, but superficially it seems like
it might be worth thinking about integrating the -Walloc-larger-than
warnings into the -Walloca pass, if only to keep similar functionality
in the same plac
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:09 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/21/19 5:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:13 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 M
On 5/21/19 5:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:13 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:13 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
2 pieces:
- the first one handles the case where the denominator is negative. It
doesn't hap
On 5/20/19 11:37 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> Given code sinkings obvious effects on SSA value-range representation
>>> it may make sense to add another instance of that pass earlier.
>> There is an early pass alre
On Mon, 20 May 2019, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Given code sinkings obvious effects on SSA value-range representation
it may make sense to add another instance of that pass earlier.
There is an early pass already.
IIUC Richard was talking about adding an early
On 5/20/19 2:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2 pieces:
>>
>> - the first one handles the case where the denominator is negative. It
>> doesn't happen often with exact_div, so I don't handle it everywhere, but
>> this one looked t
On 5/20/19 3:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
2 pieces:
- the first one handles the case where the deno
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> 2 pieces:
> >>
> >> - the first one handles the case where the denominator is negative. It
> >> doesn't happen oft
On Mon, 20 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
2 pieces:
- the first one handles the case where the denominator is negative. It
doesn't happen often with exact_div, so I don't handle it everywhere, but
this one looked trivial
- handle t
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2 pieces:
>
> - the first one handles the case where the denominator is negative. It
> doesn't happen often with exact_div, so I don't handle it everywhere, but
> this one looked trivial
>
> - handle the case where a pointer differe
Hello,
2 pieces:
- the first one handles the case where the denominator is negative. It
doesn't happen often with exact_div, so I don't handle it everywhere, but
this one looked trivial
- handle the case where a pointer difference is cast to an unsigned type
before being compared to a const
22 matches
Mail list logo
