On 25/05/2018 21:19, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 25 May 2018 at 22:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Why is this patch removing _Compare() calls? That changes the
initialization
of _Compare from value-initialization to default-initialization, which
is a breaking change.
The _Rb_tree_key_compare base
On 25 May 2018 at 22:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Why is this patch removing _Compare() calls? That changes the
>> initialization
>> of _Compare from value-initialization to default-initialization, which
>> is a breaking change.
>
>
> The _Rb_tree_key_compare base class will still value-initializ
On 25/05/18 21:35 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 25 May 2018 at 19:50, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
As we are at working on associative containers I'd like to propose this last
patch to remove the copy constructible constraint on the _Compare functor
when it is supposed to be default construc
On 25 May 2018 at 19:50, François Dumont wrote:
> Hi
>
> As we are at working on associative containers I'd like to propose this last
> patch to remove the copy constructible constraint on the _Compare functor
> when it is supposed to be default constructed.
>
> This way the _Compare is built dire
Hi
As we are at working on associative containers I'd like to propose this
last patch to remove the copy constructible constraint on the _Compare
functor when it is supposed to be default constructed.
This way the _Compare is built directly at its final place.
* include/bits/stl_tree.h (
