On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:25:35AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek writes:
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:49:56AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> Is the patch OK as a compromise for GCC 8? We don't speculatively
> >> increase the user alignment in increase_alignment, but do s
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:49:56AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Is the patch OK as a compromise for GCC 8? We don't speculatively
>> increase the user alignment in increase_alignment, but do still increase
>> it if it helps to vectorise a particular loop access?
>
>
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:49:56AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Is the patch OK as a compromise for GCC 8? We don't speculatively
> increase the user alignment in increase_alignment, but do still increase
> it if it helps to vectorise a particular loop access?
I'd be a little bit worried abo
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> r241959 included code to stop us increasing the alignment of a
>>> "user-aligned" variable. This wasn't the main purpose of the patch,
>>> and I th
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> r241959 included code to stop us increasing the alignment of a
>> "user-aligned" variable. This wasn't the main purpose of the patch,
>> and I think it was just there to make the
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> r241959 included code to stop us increasing the alignment of a
> "user-aligned" variable. This wasn't the main purpose of the patch,
> and I think it was just there to make the testcase work.
>
> The documentation for the aligned attribut
r241959 included code to stop us increasing the alignment of a
"user-aligned" variable. This wasn't the main purpose of the patch,
and I think it was just there to make the testcase work.
The documentation for the aligned attribute says:
This attribute specifies a minimum alignment for the var
