On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> One of the original requirements for getting wide-int.h accepted
> was that it should work efficiently on trees. Through a process
> that I no longer recall exactly, this ended up meaning that we can
> use things like:
>
>wi::add (t,
One of the original requirements for getting wide-int.h accepted
was that it should work efficiently on trees. Through a process
that I no longer recall exactly, this ended up meaning that we can
use things like:
wi::add (t, 1)
to add 1 to an INTEGER_CST T in its native precision. However, w
