On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard B suggested we should replace dconsthalf etc. with
> dconst<1, 2> (). When I tried that, the extra comma caused problems
> with some lingering uses of the old target macros for handling reals
> (e.g. REAL_ARITHMETIC instead of re
Richard B suggested we should replace dconsthalf etc. with
dconst<1, 2> (). When I tried that, the extra comma caused problems
with some lingering uses of the old target macros for handling reals
(e.g. REAL_ARITHMETIC instead of real_arithmetic), since the constant
was then treated as two macro pa
