On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 09:58:50AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On Mar 5, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 01:52:20PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> >> We realized recently that the use of "rs6000" in a builtin name doesn't
> >> agr
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 01:52:20PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> We realized recently that the use of "rs6000" in a builtin name doesn't agree
>> with our normal naming conventions. Thus this patch changes such a builtin
>>
Hi!
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 01:52:20PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> We realized recently that the use of "rs6000" in a builtin name doesn't agree
> with our normal naming conventions. Thus this patch changes such a builtin
> to __builtin_powerpc_speculation_barrier instead.
>
> Bootstrapped and
Hi,
We realized recently that the use of "rs6000" in a builtin name doesn't agree
with our normal naming conventions. Thus this patch changes such a builtin
to __builtin_powerpc_speculation_barrier instead.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no regressions. Is
this okay for t
