> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:41:55 +0200
> From: ja...@redhat.com
> To: l...@redhat.com
> CC: hiradi...@msn.com; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Remove splay_tree from gimplify.c
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:34:46AM -0600,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:34:46AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> So the question here is whether or not the other uses are commonly looking
> up elements we've already searched for -- that's the whole purpose of a
> splay tree, to improve lookup performance for commonly hit items.
First of all, this is
don't need to update the tree in these cases at least.
I have pasted the patch which removes splay_tree with hash_map. Another patch
(attached) removes splay_tree with std::map.
Please review the patches.
Thanks,
-Aditya
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-17 hiraditya
Remove
se cases at least.
I have pasted the patch which removes splay_tree with hash_map. Another patch
(attached) removes splay_tree with std::map.
Please review the patches.
Thanks,
-Aditya
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-17 hiraditya
Remove splay_tree from gimplify.c
* gimplify.c (struct g