On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
>
>> > Btw, I don't remember why I chose ALLOCA_FOR_VAR_P over
>> > CALL_ALLOCA_FOR_VAR_P but, given the name of the GIMPLE flag and
>> > predicate, it's probably time to change it.
>>
>> Good i
> r172516, for reference also below. I later saw that my patch causes
> cxg2001 to fail. I've analyzed it enough to be sure that it's only
> exposed by this patch (due to inlining now happening), in fact it's a
> problem in IRA that is reproducible with a C++ testcase even without the
> patch. I
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
> > Btw, I don't remember why I chose ALLOCA_FOR_VAR_P over
> > CALL_ALLOCA_FOR_VAR_P but, given the name of the GIMPLE flag and
> > predicate, it's probably time to change it.
>
> Good idea, I'll rename it before checking in.
r172516, for referenc
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > We have a flag for this already on the CALL_EXPR. But we don't retain
> > it over tuples, and hence we also don't look at it in
> > inline_forbidden_p_stmt. This patch fixes both. (The strange testing
> > of builtin-ness is because in CALL_E
> We have a flag for this already on the CALL_EXPR. But we don't retain it
> over tuples, and hence we also don't look at it in
> inline_forbidden_p_stmt. This patch fixes both. (The strange testing of
> builtin-ness is because in CALL_EXPR the ALLOCA_FOR_VAR_P and
> CALL_FROM_THUNK_P flags are
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as my patch for stack-arrays in fortran reveals we a problem that VLA
> objects basically prevent all inlining to happen. They're transformed
> into alloca calls and those are considered to disable inlining. The
> (correct) fear b
Hello,
as my patch for stack-arrays in fortran reveals we a problem that VLA
objects basically prevent all inlining to happen. They're transformed
into alloca calls and those are considered to disable inlining. The
(correct) fear being that inlining a bare alloca call into a loop leads to
un
