Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Okay, so I applied this patch plus the one below to adjust
gcc-4.9/changes.html accordingly. (The first anchor there
is not stable, but for other reasons.)
But it should be sufficient to check them before the release and then
one is fine as the links should refer to the
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Looks good to me. (I fully concur that the _002d is ugly.)
Okay, so I applied this patch plus the one below to adjust
gcc-4.9/changes.html accordingly. (The first anchor there
is not stable, but for other reasons.)
Thanks for pushing for this fix!
Ger
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Below you'll find a patch for maintainer-scripts/update_web_docs_svn
which I tested on gcc.gnu.org and the current documentation pages (not
those for older releases) are adjusted now.
Among others this fixes the link you reported above (though adjusting
gcc-4.9/changes.html
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Loop_002dSpecific-Pragmas.html
>> However, some script changes the link to:
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Loop-Specific-Pragmas.html
>> which won't work. Try yourself at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/c
Working on it. I hope to have a patch within the next 48 hours.
Gerald
On October 25, 2013 22:32, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Thanks for looking at the patch. However, the patch has a link
problem. The documentation is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Loop_002dSpecific-Pragmas.html
That's also the link I use in the changes.html file. However, so
