On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> There are some other cpuid vendor signatures than AMD and Intel,
>
> How about a patch with this complete list?
Well, OK then. It won't hurt.
The patch is OK for mainline with appropria
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> There are some other cpuid vendor signatures than AMD and Intel,
How about a patch with this complete list?
d-gcc-cpuid-signature
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> There are some other cpuid vendor signatures than AMD and Intel, and
> probably there will be some more.
Sure, if there are still people using those they can easily add those.
> IMO, anybody using __get_cpuid_max
> call should define accepted
Hello!
> The x86 cpuid instruction returns a processor ID and the
> __get_cpuid_max function even explicitly makes the %ebx value directly
> available. But users of that function have to use a cryptic constant.
> How about adding a few macros to make this more transparent?
There are some other
