Re: sparc64*-*-rtems* should not define __svr4__

2013-05-14 Thread Eric Botcazou
> I forgot to ask. Did you put this on the open branches as well? 4.7 and 4.8. No, on mainline only (as written in the previous message). I can backport to 4.8 though, but it's too late for 4.7. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: sparc64*-*-rtems* should not define __svr4__

2013-05-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
I forgot to ask. Did you put this on the open branches as well? 4.7 and 4.8. Please and thank you Eric Botcazou wrote: > sparc64*-*-rtems* ends up with __svr4__ defined. The attached > patch corrects that. Let's remove the FIXME instead. Applied to mainline. 2013-05-14 Eric Botcazou

Re: sparc64*-*-rtems* should not define __svr4__

2013-05-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
Thanks Eric. This is better. spaec64-elf should not define it either. Eric Botcazou wrote: > sparc64*-*-rtems* ends up with __svr4__ defined. The attached > patch corrects that. Let's remove the FIXME instead. Applied to mainline. 2013-05-14 Eric Botcazou * config/sparc/sp64-elf

Re: sparc64*-*-rtems* should not define __svr4__

2013-05-14 Thread Eric Botcazou
> sparc64*-*-rtems* ends up with __svr4__ defined. The attached > patch corrects that. Let's remove the FIXME instead. Applied to mainline. 2013-05-14 Eric Botcazou * config/sparc/sp64-elf.h (CPP_SUBTARGET_SPEC): Delete. * config/sparc/openbsd64.h (CPP_SUBTARGET_SPEC): Likew