On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 13:41 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Alan Modra via Gcc-patches writes:
> > I believe set_rtx_cost is meant to handle a SET, not a PLUS as is
> > passed in these two locations. Using the proper function for a PLUS
> > doesn't make a huge difference: the only arg change to
Alan Modra via Gcc-patches writes:
> I believe set_rtx_cost is meant to handle a SET, not a PLUS as is
> passed in these two locations. Using the proper function for a PLUS
> doesn't make a huge difference: the only arg change to rtx_cost of any
> consequence is outer_code of SET rather than INSN
