On Fri, 6 May 2011, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:29:13AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > Alan, is mcmodel suppose to set m64?
>
> No, that was an accident.
Thanks. I'll apply this patch to remove that fall through. Tested
building cc1 and xgcc for cross to powerpc64-linux-gn
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2011, Michael Eager wrote:
>
>> David Edelsohn wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
>> > > next case without
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:29:13AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Alan, is mcmodel suppose to set m64?
No, that was an accident.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:08:43PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Yes, it was an error on my part. Sorry. I will fix the GCC 4.6 branch. I
> will hold off fixing the on trunk, on the assumption this patch will go in. I
> can fix it if desired.
I committed the following patch on the GCC 4.6 b
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Michael Eager wrote:
David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
next case without comments to indicate if this was intended. I added
comments t
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Michael Eager wrote:
> David Edelsohn wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
> > > next case without comments to indicate if this was intended. I added
> > > commen
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:08:24AM -0700, Michael Eager wrote:
> David Edelsohn wrote:
> >On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers
> >wrote:
> >
> >>Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
> >>next case without comments to indicate if this was intended. I add
David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
next case without comments to indicate if this was intended. I added
comments to make the semantics explicit. Given the documentation, it
may wel
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
> next case without comments to indicate if this was intended. I added
> comments to make the semantics explicit. Given the documentation, it
> may well be intentional
