On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 05:29:30PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> On 20-12-14 10:22:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 03:57:27PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> > > > It is both, actually (-mcpu= implies -mtune=)
> > > Yes, but -mtune doesn't imply -mcpu. If I set up only -mtune, -
On 20-12-14 10:22:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 03:57:27PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> > > It is both, actually (-mcpu= implies -mtune=)
> > Yes, but -mtune doesn't imply -mcpu. If I set up only -mtune, -mcpu is the
> > generic one (ppc970 for BE)
>
> But that is not wha
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 03:57:27PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> > It is both, actually (-mcpu= implies -mtune=)
> Yes, but -mtune doesn't imply -mcpu. If I set up only -mtune, -mcpu is the
> generic one (ppc970 for BE)
But that is not what the patch does?
> > > Linux also does similarly in linux6
On 20-12-13 09:48:35, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:34:57PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> > this is only default tuning (-mtune, not -mcpu).
>
> It is both, actually (-mcpu= implies -mtune=)
Yes, but -mtune doesn't imply -mcpu. If I set up only -mtune, -mcpu is the
Hi!
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:34:57PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> this is only default tuning (-mtune, not -mcpu).
It is both, actually (-mcpu= implies -mtune=)
> Linux also does similarly in linux64.h:
> 74 #undef PROCESSOR_DEFAULT
> 75 #define PROCESSOR_DEFAULT PROCESSOR_POWER7
>
Hello,
this is only default tuning (-mtune, not -mcpu). Linux also does similarly in
linux64.h:
74 #undef PROCESSOR_DEFAULT
75 #define PROCESSOR_DEFAULT PROCESSOR_POWER7
76 #undef PROCESSOR_DEFAULT64
77 #define PROCESSOR_DEFAULT64 PROCESSOR_POWER8
Although there is hard to
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 01:10:58AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Piotr is the one spending most times on ensuring FreeBSD ports work
> fine on POWER, so personally I'm happy to follow his recommendation
> on such matters.
I have a question though:
> -/* Until now the 970 is the only Processor wh
