Le 08/04/2015 12:29, Mikael Morin a écrit :
> Except that the following ... ahem ... doesn't work.
>
And it doesn't work because gfc_get_ha_symbol doesn't version
host-associated symbols.
So one has to call symbol.c's save_symbol_data by hand. And then, we
can as well keep the original gfc_find_s
Le 07/04/2015 14:25, Mikael Morin a écrit :
> Le 06/04/2015 20:26, Mikael Morin a écrit :
>> Regarding the patch, I don't understand why the existing symbol
>> restoration code doesn't work here (see
>> gfc_restore_last_undo_checkpoint, restore_old_symbol). I have to
>> investigate more.
>
> I th
Le 06/04/2015 20:26, Mikael Morin a écrit :
> Regarding the patch, I don't understand why the existing symbol
> restoration code doesn't work here (see
> gfc_restore_last_undo_checkpoint, restore_old_symbol). I have to
> investigate more.
I think the problem is the usage of gfc_find_symbol in
gfc
Dear Evangelos,
I have posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35240
a reformatted patch along the Mikael's comment. I have also fixed
a failure in the test (parentheses have to be escaped).
The patch fixes not only pr59016, but also
pr50259 (there are probably random ICEs?)
pr56
Le 06/04/2015 01:04, Evangelos Drikos a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch, type 0, has been discussed a little at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
>
> Yet, the final version submitted is slightly different from the ones
> discussed and tested in the above link.
>
> Ha
