On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:46:39AM +, Joel Hutton wrote:
> > + if (ot_plus == unknown_optab
> > + || ot_minus == unknown_optab
> > + || optab_handler (ot_minus, TYPE_MODE (step_vectype)) ==
> > CODE_FOR_nothing
> > + || optab_handler (ot_plus, TYPE_MODE (step_vectype)) ==
> > +
> + if (ot_plus == unknown_optab
> + || ot_minus == unknown_optab
> + || optab_handler (ot_minus, TYPE_MODE (step_vectype)) ==
> CODE_FOR_nothing
> + || optab_handler (ot_plus, TYPE_MODE (step_vectype)) ==
> + CODE_FOR_nothing)
> return false;
>
> Won't optab_handler just retu
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:37:03AM +, Joel Hutton via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on releases/gcc-11 on aarch64.
>
> Ok for 11?
>
> Previous commit broke build as it relied on directly_supported_p which
> is not in 11. This reworks to avoid using directly_supported
ot;) - was:
Re: pr103523: Check for PLUS/MINUS support
My mistake, reworked patch. Tests are still running.
From: Richard Biener
mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com>>
Sent: 13 December 2021 14:47
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org<mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org&g
(no "directly_supported_p") - was:
Re: pr103523: Check for PLUS/MINUS support
On December 13, 2021 3:27:50 PM GMT+01:00, Tobias Burnus
wrote:
>Hi Joel,
>
>your patch fails here with:
>
>../../repos/gcc-11-commit/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c:8000:8: error:
>‘directly_supported
t;
>> From: Richard Sandiford
>> Sent: 10 December 2021 10:22
>> To: Joel Hutton
>> Cc: GCC Patches ; Richard Biener
>> Subject: Re: pr103523: Check for PLUS/MINUS support
>>
>> Joel Hutton writes:
>>> Hi
wrote:
ok for backport to 11?
From: Richard Sandiford
Sent: 10 December 2021 10:22
To: Joel Hutton
Cc: GCC Patches ; Richard Biener
Subject: Re: pr103523: Check for PLUS/MINUS support
Joel Hutton writes:
Hi all,
This is to address pr103523.
bootstrapped and regre
Joel Hutton writes:
> ok for backport to 11?
Yes, thanks.
Richard
ok for backport to 11?
From: Richard Sandiford
Sent: 10 December 2021 10:22
To: Joel Hutton
Cc: GCC Patches ; Richard Biener
Subject: Re: pr103523: Check for PLUS/MINUS support
Joel Hutton writes:
> Hi all,
>
> This is to address pr103523.
>
> b
Joel Hutton writes:
> Hi all,
>
> This is to address pr103523.
>
> bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64.
>
> Check for PLUS_EXPR/MINUS_EXPR support in vectorizable_induction.
> PR103523 is an ICE on valid code:
>
> void d(float *a, float b, int c) {
> float e;
> for (; c; c--, e +
10 matches
Mail list logo
