On 2014-06-05, 8:37 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:00:51PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
From my perspective, I think this should go in, and be backported to 4.9.
I've committed it as rev. 211320 for trunk and rev. 211319 for gcc-4.9
branch.
2014-06-06 Vladimir M
On 5 June 2014 14:37, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:00:51PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> On 2014-06-03, 6:02 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> >>The following patch PR61325. The details can be foun
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:00:51PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 2014-06-03, 6:02 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> >>The following patch PR61325. The details can be found on
> >>
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
On 2014-06-03, 6:02 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The following patch PR61325. The details can be found on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committe
On 2014-06-03, 6:02 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The following patch PR61325. The details can be found on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committe
On 4 June 2014 00:02, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> The following patch PR61325. The details can be found on
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325
>>
>> The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
>>
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch PR61325. The details can be found on
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325
>
> The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
>
> Committed as rev. 211060 to gcc-4.9 branch and a
