On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 at 15:43, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Hi,
> here is updated patch.
>
> I am not ceratin if:
> const size_t __diffmax
> = __gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits::__max / sizeof(_CharT);
> really needs "/ sizeof (_CharT)". I think we only need to be able to
> compute the diffe
Hi,
here is updated patch.
I am not ceratin if:
const size_t __diffmax
= __gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits::__max / sizeof(_CharT);
really needs "/ sizeof (_CharT)". I think we only need to be able to
compute the difference between two entries in multiplies of sizeof(_CharT)?
However
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 at 12:22, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > On 24/11/24 01:42 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > another common source of unnecesary throw_bad_alloc calls is
> > > basic_string::_M_create.
> > >basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::
> > >_M_create(size_type& __capacity,
> On 24/11/24 01:42 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > another common source of unnecesary throw_bad_alloc calls is
> > basic_string::_M_create.
> >basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::
> >_M_create(size_type& __capacity, size_type __old_capacity)
> >{
> > // _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE
On 24/11/24 01:42 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
another common source of unnecesary throw_bad_alloc calls is
basic_string::_M_create.
basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::
_M_create(size_type& __capacity, size_type __old_capacity)
{
// _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
// 83. St
Hi Honza, please CC the libstdc++ list on patches, thanks.
On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 at 00:43, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Hi,
> another common source of unnecesary throw_bad_alloc calls is
> basic_string::_M_create.
> basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::
> _M_create(size_type& __capacity, size_
