Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-29 Thread DJ Delorie
Are there any further comments on this? Do I need to post a final patch? Can it be committed yet?

Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-14 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:51 PM, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Steven, > >> Should new ports be allowed in if they rely so heavily on reload? > > As it happens I am currently working on enabling LRA for the MSP430 target. > Although I have run into a roadblock with a possibly unacceptable patch to > sim

Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-14 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/5/14 nick clifton : > Hi Steven, > > >> Should new ports be allowed in if they rely so heavily on reload? > > As it happens I am currently working on enabling LRA for the MSP430 target. > Although I have run into a roadblock with a possibly unacceptable patch to > simplify_subreg_regno: > >

Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-14 Thread nick clifton
Hi Steven, > Should new ports be allowed in if they rely so heavily on reload? As it happens I am currently working on enabling LRA for the MSP430 target. Although I have run into a roadblock with a possibly unacceptable patch to simplify_subreg_regno: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/20

Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-13 Thread DJ Delorie
> "run-time", according to my reading of > http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html . I chenged it, but I note that "runtime" is used much more often than "run-time" and "run time" in the docs. However, "runtime" is preferred for "libraries and system support present at run time", which is what

Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-13 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/5/13 Steven Bosscher : > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Fri, 10 May 2013, DJ Delorie wrote: >>> Index: MAINTAINERS >>> === >>> +msp430 port DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com >>> +msp430

Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-12 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> I'll bring this up on the steering committee (not that I expect >> a lot of discussion :-). > Actually I hope for some discussion: > > Should new ports be allowed in if they rely so heavily on reload? That's a gcc(-patches)@gcc.gnu.org level discussi

Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-12 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2013, DJ Delorie wrote: >> Index: MAINTAINERS >> === >> +msp430 port DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com >> +msp430 port Nick Clifton

Re: new port: msp430-elf, revision 2

2013-05-12 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 10 May 2013, DJ Delorie wrote: > Index: MAINTAINERS > === > +msp430 port DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com > +msp430 port Nick Cliftonni...@redhat.com I'll bring this up on the steering comm