On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > Joseph suggested these two bug-fix commits (trunk r198621 and r198622)
> > > should be applied to earlier release branches, too. OK?
>
> Joseph, which release branches would you like me to commit these two
> patches to?
4.7 and 4.8 (subject of c
Hi!
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:08:16 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge writes:
> > On Sun, 05 May 2013 18:55:09 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >> Thomas Schwinge writes:
> >>
> >> >> libgcc/
> >> >> * fp-bit.c (unpack_d, pack_d): Properly preserve and restore a
> >> >>
Thomas Schwinge writes:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 05 May 2013 18:55:09 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Thomas Schwinge writes:
>>
>> >> libgcc/
>> >> * fp-bit.c (unpack_d, pack_d): Properly preserve and restore a
>> >> NaN's payload.
>> >> * fp-bit.h [FLOAT] (QUIET_NAN): Correct value.
>>
>>
Hi!
On Sun, 05 May 2013 18:55:09 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge writes:
>
> >> libgcc/
> >>* fp-bit.c (unpack_d, pack_d): Properly preserve and restore a
> >>NaN's payload.
> >>* fp-bit.h [FLOAT] (QUIET_NAN): Correct value.
>
> This is OK.
Joseph suggested these
Thomas Schwinge writes:
>> libgcc/
>> * fp-bit.c (unpack_d, pack_d): Properly preserve and restore a
>> NaN's payload.
>> * fp-bit.h [FLOAT] (QUIET_NAN): Correct value.
This is OK.
Thanks.
Ian
Hi Iain!
Joseph pointed out that I didn't include you, the libgcc and fp-bit
maintainer, in my mails' recipient lists. I'm waiting for approval for
the following changes:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:52:23 +0200, I wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:55:37 +0100, "Maciej W. Rozycki"
> wrote:
> > On Fri,
Hi!
Ping.
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:16:52 +0200, I wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:52:23 +0200, I wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:55:37 +0100, "Maciej W. Rozycki"
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > > > Index: gcc/config/fp-bit.c
> > > > >
Hi!
Ping.
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:52:23 +0200, I wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:55:37 +0100, "Maciej W. Rozycki"
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > > Index: gcc/config/fp-bit.c
> > > > ===
> > > > RCS file
Hi!
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:55:37 +0100, "Maciej W. Rozycki"
wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > Index: gcc/config/fp-bit.c
> > > ===
> > > RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/gcc/config/fp-bit.c,v
> > > retrieving revision
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> As I understand it (and I may add that this is the first time ever I'm
> looking at soft-fp internals), that appears to be a bug in soft-fp, in
> this very code added ten years ago ;-), which is invoked by means of
> _df_to_tf.o:__extenddftf2 for this c
Hi!
Re-visiting this patch/commit after a mere ten years, ha, ha. :-) Surely
everyone must still be having context on this issue... (MIPS and soft-fp
maintainers CCed.)
On 01 Apr 2003 18:44:53 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Index: gcc/ChangeLog
> from Alexandre Oliva
>
> * real.h (E
11 matches
Mail list logo