Re: libstdc++-v3: do not duplicate some math functions when using newlib

2024-10-31 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
On 31/10/2024 08:23, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Oct 25, 2024, "Andre Vieira (lists)" wrote: I have to admit I am not super familiar with long doubles, either than knowing they are 128-bit FP representations... but bisect has pointed me to this patch when investigating a regression on aarch64

Re: libstdc++-v3: do not duplicate some math functions when using newlib

2024-10-31 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Oct 25, 2024, "Andre Vieira (lists)" wrote: > I have to admit I am not super familiar with long doubles, either than > knowing they are 128-bit FP representations... but bisect has pointed > me to this patch when investigating a regression on > aarch64_be-none-elf for the libstdc++ testcase: >

Re: libstdc++-v3: do not duplicate some math functions when using newlib

2024-10-25 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
Hey, I have to admit I am not super familiar with long doubles, either than knowing they are 128-bit FP representations... but bisect has pointed me to this patch when investigating a regression on aarch64_be-none-elf for the libstdc++ testcase: 26_numerics/complex/13450.cc After some reduct

Re: libstdc++-v3: do not duplicate some math functions when using newlib

2023-06-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, 01:46 Alexandre Oliva via Libstdc++, < libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > Contributing a patch by Joel Brobecker . > Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu just to be sure, also tested with > aarch64-rtems6. I'm going to put this in later this week if there > aren't any objections. >