On 10/06/20 18:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 10/06/20 4:49 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 10/06/20 08:18 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
On 09/06/20 10:53 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This reminds me that I was going to extend the condition for using
memcmp to also apply to
On 10/06/20 4:49 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 10/06/20 08:18 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
On 09/06/20 10:53 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This reminds me that I was going to extend the condition for using
memcmp to also apply to unsigned integers with sizeof(T) > 1 on big
endian t
On 10/06/20 08:18 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
On 09/06/20 10:53 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This reminds me that I was going to extend the condition for using
memcmp to also apply to unsigned integers with sizeof(T) > 1 on big
endian targets.
This illustrates what I tried to avo
On 09/06/20 10:53 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/06/20 22:42 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
On 09/06/20 6:11 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/06/20 00:02 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 22:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrot
On 09/06/20 22:42 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
On 09/06/20 6:11 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/06/20 00:02 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 22:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumon
On 09/06/20 22:35 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
On 09/06/20 12:24 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend
On 09/06/20 6:11 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/06/20 00:02 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 22:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo pat
On 09/06/20 22:20 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
On 08/06/20 8:20 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend the
memcmp optimization to std::deque iterators a
On 09/06/20 12:24 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend the
memcmp optimization to std::deque iterators and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mode
On 08/06/20 8:20 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend the
memcmp optimization to std::deque iterators and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mode.
   To do so I had to return int in impleme
On 09/06/20 17:11 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/06/20 00:02 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 22:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo
On 09/06/20 00:02 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 22:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend the
memcmp optimiza
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend the
memcmp optimization to std::deque iterators and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mode.
   To do so I had to return int in imp
On 08/06/20 22:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend the
memcmp optimization to std::deque iterators and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
On 08/06/20 19:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend the
memcmp optimization to std::deque iterators and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mode.
   To do so I had to return int in imp
On 08/06/20 21:07 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.tcc
b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.tcc
index 888ac803ae5..ca4e2d52d1d 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_ite
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.tcc
b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.tcc
index 888ac803ae5..ca4e2d52d1d 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_i
On 05/06/20 22:24 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
Hi
   Here is the last of my algo patches this time to extend the memcmp
optimization to std::deque iterators and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mode.
   To do so I had to return int in implementation details of
lexicographical_compare t
18 matches
Mail list logo
