Hi Ian,
> Thanks for the note. This patch should fix the problem. Bootstrapped
> and ran Go tests on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, both normally and pretending
> that the system had no memmem. Committed to mainline.
I've now verified the patch on i386-pc-solaris2.10: bootstrap restored.
Thanks.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> Compared with my patch, there are some new failures:
>
> Thanks. We probably need a patch in gcc/testsuite/go.test/go-test.exp
> to set goarch to amd64p32 when appropriate.
This is tha
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:08 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:57 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:06 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Compared with my patch, there are some new failures:
> >>
>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:22 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
>
>> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
>> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
>> message. I've attached some of the more relevant directories. This
>> update required some minor
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
>> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
>> message. I've attached some of the more rel
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:57 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:06 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >
>> > Compared with my patch, there are some new failures:
>>
>> Thanks. We probably need a patch in gcc/testsuite/go.test/go-test.exp
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:06 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > Compared with my patch, there are some new failures:
>
> Thanks. We probably need a patch in gcc/testsuite/go.test/go-test.exp
> to set goarch to amd64p32 when appropriate.
>
> Other
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> Compared with my patch, there are some new failures:
Thanks. We probably need a patch in gcc/testsuite/go.test/go-test.exp
to set goarch to amd64p32 when appropriate.
Other than that there seems to be some sort of signal handling
problem. Hard
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:27 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:50 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
>>>
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:50 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
>>> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:50 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
>> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
>> message. I've attached some of the more rel
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:54 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> All execution tests are now failing with "fatal error: impossible call
> to aeshashbody".
Thanks. Fixed by this patch, which adds AES hash code for arm64 using
intrinsics. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and
aarch4-unknown-
Hi Ian,
> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
> message. I've attached some of the more relevant directories. This
> update required some minor patches to the gotools directory and the Go
> tes
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
> message. I've attached some of the more relevant directories. This
> update required some minor patch
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
>>> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
>>> message. I've attached some of the
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
>> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
>> message. I've attached some of the more relevant directories. This
>> update required some minor
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:50 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
>> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
>> message. I've attached some of the more rel
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
> message. I've attached some of the more relevant directories. This
> update required some minor
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 1:38 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
>
>> On Sep 24 2018, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> * Makefile.am (mostlyclean-local): Run chmod on check-go-dir to
>>> make sure it is writable.
>>> (check-go-tools): Likewise.
>>
>> $ make check-gotools
>> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/loc
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:54 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> All execution tests are now failing with "fatal error: impossible call
> to aeshashbody".
Which target?
Ian
All execution tests are now failing with "fatal error: impossible call
to aeshashbody".
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
Hi Andreas,
> On Sep 24 2018, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> * Makefile.am (mostlyclean-local): Run chmod on check-go-dir to
>> make sure it is writable.
>> (check-go-tools): Likewise.
>
> $ make check-gotools
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180926/Build/gotools'
> chmod -R u+w
Hi Ian,
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>>
>>> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgo/go/runtime/traceback_gccgo.go:151:14:
>>> error: reference to undefined name 'nanotime'
>>> 151 | waitfor = (nanotime() - gp.waitsince) / 60e9
>>> | ^
>>>
>>> and many ma
> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
> message. I've attached some of the more relevant directories. This
> update required some minor patches to the gotools directory and the Go
> testsuite, a
On Sep 24 2018, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> * Makefile.am (mostlyclean-local): Run chmod on check-go-dir to
> make sure it is writable.
> (check-go-tools): Likewise.
$ make check-gotools
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180926/Build/gotools'
chmod -R u+w check-go-dir
chmod: cannot
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
>
>> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgo/go/runtime/traceback_gccgo.go:151:14:
>> error: reference to undefined name 'nanotime'
>> 151 | waitfor = (nanotime() - gp.waitsince) / 60e9
>> | ^
>>
>> and many many more instances.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 1:03 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> ../../../libgo/go/internal/cpu/cpu.go:21:16: error: reference to undefined
> name ‘CacheLineSize’
> 21 | _[CacheLineSize]byte
>|^
> ../../../libgo/go/internal/cpu/cpu.go:38:16: error: reference to undefined
Hi Ian,
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgo/go/runtime/traceback_gccgo.go:151:14:
> error: reference to undefined name 'nanotime'
> 151 | waitfor = (nanotime() - gp.waitsince) / 60e9
> | ^
>
> and many many more instances. Again, I found an implementation in
> upstream src
Hi Ian,
> I've committed a patch to update libgo to the 1.11 release. As usual
> for these updates, the patch is too large to attach to this e-mail
> message. I've attached some of the more relevant directories. This
> update required some minor patches to the gotools directory and the Go
> tes
../../../libgo/go/internal/cpu/cpu.go:21:16: error: reference to undefined name
‘CacheLineSize’
21 | _[CacheLineSize]byte
|^
../../../libgo/go/internal/cpu/cpu.go:38:16: error: reference to undefined name
‘CacheLineSize’
38 | _[CacheLineSize]byte
|
It also breaks ia64.
../../../libgo/go/internal/bytealg/indexbyte_native.go:10:1: error:
redefinition of 'IndexByte'
10 | func IndexByte(b []byte, c byte) int
| ^
../../../libgo/go/internal/bytealg/indexbyte_generic.go:12:1: note: previous
definition of 'IndexByte' was here
12 | func IndexByt
This breaks aarch64/-mabi=ilp32.
../../../../libgo/go/internal/poll/splice_linux.go:165:45: error: reference to
undefined identifier 'syscall.SYS_FCNTL'
165 | if _, _, errno := syscall.Syscall(syscall.SYS_FCNTL, uintptr(fds[0]),
syscall.F_GETPIPE_SZ, 0); errno != 0 {
|
32 matches
Mail list logo
