On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jun 23 2017, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> Andreas, can we avoid the problem for earlier glibc versions with a
>> patch like the appended?
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> diff --git a/libgo/sysinfo.c b/libgo/sysinfo.c
>> index a1afc7d1..80407443 100644
On Jun 23 2017, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Andreas, can we avoid the problem for earlier glibc versions with a
> patch like the appended?
>
> Ian
>
> diff --git a/libgo/sysinfo.c b/libgo/sysinfo.c
> index a1afc7d1..80407443 100644
> --- a/libgo/sysinfo.c
> +++ b/libgo/sysinfo.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,10 @
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:34 AM, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22/06/17 20:59, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> James, any thoughts?
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> On Jun 21 2017, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>>
Index: libgo/sysinfo.c
Hi,
On 22/06/17 20:59, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> James, any thoughts?
>
> Ian
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Jun 21 2017, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> Index: libgo/sysinfo.c
>>> ===
>>> --- lib
James, any thoughts?
Ian
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jun 21 2017, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> Index: libgo/sysinfo.c
>> ===
>> --- libgo/sysinfo.c (revision 249205)
>> +++ libgo/sysinfo.c (work
On Jun 21 2017, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Index: libgo/sysinfo.c
> ===
> --- libgo/sysinfo.c (revision 249205)
> +++ libgo/sysinfo.c (working copy)
> @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@
> #if defined(HAVE_LINUX_NETLINK_H)
> #include
> #endif
