> I suppose 'set t [...]' can be let go, too?
Duh (x2).
Pushed, on top of the previous patch.
FX
0001-Testsuite-remove-unused-variables.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi!
On 2023-11-15T11:29:20+0100, FX Coudert wrote:
>>> it's unclear if those messages can just be removed (they are pretty
>>> cryptic as is) or at least changed to use verbose instead of puts.
>>> Please fix.
>
> I don’t see value in this output, so I think it’s best to remove the puts
> calls
Hi FX,
>> FX submitted the patch series, I can find the reference if you need it.
>
> Patch was submitted in this thread:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/630096.html
ah, I see. I'd been looking for the patch summary and Iain's name in my
searches; that's why I came up
> FX submitted the patch series, I can find the reference if you need it.
Patch was submitted in this thread:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/630096.html
>> Besides,
>> it's unclear if those messages can just be removed (they are pretty
>> cryptic as is) or at least cha
Hi Rainer,
> On 13 Nov 2023, at 05:27, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> I happened to notice that make check output is cluttered with the likes
> of
>
> dg set al
> -B/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc/build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/./libatomic/
> -B/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc/build/i386-pc-solar
