On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 21 January 2015 at 23:18, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >> Thanks. I had wrongly made eliminate_constant_term() static, reverted
> >> that change and it builds on
> >> all targets in config-list.mk.
> >> Committed as r219655 (hopefully nothing breaks!
> Thanks, moved them to expmed.h.
> Boostrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with languages: all, testing
> in progress.
> Build on all targets in config-list.mk in progress.
> Assuming it goes fine, OK to commit ?
You can install it under the obvious rule once successfully tested.
--
Eric Botcaz
On 21 January 2015 at 23:18, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Thanks. I had wrongly made eliminate_constant_term() static, reverted
>> that change and it builds on
>> all targets in config-list.mk.
>> Committed as r219655 (hopefully nothing breaks!).
>
> Any particular reason why store_bit_field, extract_b
> Thanks. I had wrongly made eliminate_constant_term() static, reverted
> that change and it builds on
> all targets in config-list.mk.
> Committed as r219655 (hopefully nothing breaks!).
Any particular reason why store_bit_field, extract_bit_field, extract_low_bits
expand_mult and expand_mult_hi
On 14 January 2015 at 12:14, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 14 January 2015 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On 14
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 14 January 2015 at 16:40, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> > wrote:
>
On 14 January 2015 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>> > On 14 January 2015 at 16:40, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 14 January 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >>>
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> > On 14 January 2015 at 16:40, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >> On 14 January 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >>>
>
On 14 January 2015 at 16:40, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 13 January 2015 at 16:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> > wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> > On 13 January 2015 at 16:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >> On 13 January 2015 at 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >>>
>
On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 16:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On 13 January 2015 at 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>>
Hi,
This is a revamped expr.h flattening flattening patch re
On 13 January 2015 at 16:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> This is a revamped expr.h flattening flattening patch rebased on
>>> tree.h and tree-core.h flattening patch (r219402).
>>
On 13 January 2015 at 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This is a revamped expr.h flattening flattening patch rebased on
>> tree.h and tree-core.h flattening patch (r219402).
>> It depends upon the following patch to get committed.
>> https:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a revamped expr.h flattening flattening patch rebased on
> tree.h and tree-core.h flattening patch (r219402).
> It depends upon the following patch to get committed.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00565.html
>
> Chan
14 matches
Mail list logo