> 2011-03-08 Xinliang David Li
>
> PR c/47837
> * tree-ssa-uninit.c (pred_chain_length_cmp): New function.
> (normalize_preds): New function.
> (is_use_properly_guarded): Normalize def predicates.
This broke the Ada compiler on some platforms, see PR tree-opt/48988.
--
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:32, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
Regarding this particular patch, I hope it can be checked in to make
the test clean. It is a simple enhancement to a wh
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:32, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>>> Regarding this particular patch, I hope it can be checked in to make
>>> the test clean. It is a simple enhancement to a wheel that is already
>>> there. It also serves as a case that can
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:32, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Regarding this particular patch, I hope it can be checked in to make
>> the test clean. It is a simple enhancement to a wheel that is already
>> there. It also serves as a case that can be referenced in the future
>> when the more general mechanis
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/09/11 09:24, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard G
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:54:42AM -0800, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Please review the attached patch, it does some simplification of the
> complicated logical or expressions (x1 or x2 or x3 ...) constructed
> from control flow analysis into simpler form.
BTW, PR47679 is another case of predicates
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/09/11 09:24, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wro
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/09/11 09:24, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wrot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/11 09:24, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
True. I've been repeatedly thinking of building
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/11 11:07, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Ok.
>
> Regarding this particular patch, I hope it can be checked in to make
> the test clean. It is a simple enhancement to a wheel that is already
> there. It also serves as a case that can be referenced
Ok.
Regarding this particular patch, I hope it can be checked in to make
the test clean. It is a simple enhancement to a wheel that is already
there. It also serves as a case that can be referenced in the future
when the more general mechanism is available.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> True. I've been repeatedly thinking of building some on-the-side CFG
>> with value-numbered pr
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>> True. I've been repeatedly
Sounds interesting. Do you have examples to illustrate your idea?
Thanks,
David
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/08/11 11:55, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>> On 03
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> True. I've been repeatedly thinking of building some on-the-side CFG
>> with value-numbered pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/11 02:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> True. I've been repeatedly thinking of building some on-the-side CFG
> with value-numbered predicates to also catch the CFG vs. scalar-code
> predicate c
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/08/11 11:55, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> On 03/08/2011 12:54 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>> Please review the attached patch, it does some simplification of the
>>> complicated logical or exp
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/08/11 11:55, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> On 03/08/2011 12:54 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>> Please review the attached patch, it does some simplification of the
>>> complicated logical or expr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/11 11:55, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 12:54 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Please review the attached patch, it does some simplification of the
>> complicated logical or expressions (x1 or x2 or x3 ...) constructed
>> from control fl
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 12:54 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>
>> Please review the attached patch, it does some simplification of the
>> complicated logical or expressions (x1 or x2 or x3 ...) constructed
>> from control flow analysis into simpler form
On 03/08/2011 12:54 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Please review the attached patch, it does some simplification of the
complicated logical or expressions (x1 or x2 or x3 ...) constructed
from control flow analysis into simpler form.
Bootstraps and works on s390x for both testcases.
Bootstraps on
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:54, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Bootstraps on x86-64. Regression testing is on going (it takes forever
> (whole night already) to finish possibly because the lto test in
> c-torture ..).
I don't think so. We have been having weird kernel problems in our
machines when ru
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Please review the attached patch, it does some simplification of the
> complicated logical or expressions (x1 or x2 or x3 ...) constructed
> from control flow analysis into simpler form.
>
> Bootstraps and works on s390x for both testcases
25 matches
Mail list logo
