On Thursday 02 October 2014 11:42:35 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The library macros are safe and can't cause any issues, so I'm happy for
> them to go on the branch.
>
> I can think of at least two that aren't implemented on the branch:
> and the std::is_final trait (although I'd be OK with the
> tr
l Message -
From: "Jason Merrill"
To: "Ed Smith-Rowland" <3dw...@verizon.net>, "Jonathan Wakely"
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "thiago macieira"
Sent: Thursday, 2 October, 2014 4:40:03 PM
Subject: Re: feature-testing macros for 4.9
On 10/02/2014 10
On 10/02/2014 10:58 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
We've had a request from someone that we include SD-6 feature testing
for gcc-4.9.
It seems rather heavy for a backport but it might make maintainers of
large C++ libraries happy ;-) and it might make sense as people migrate
from 4.9 to 5.0 to see w
